Not All Gods Were Meant to Be Followed

2 minute study

Some figures weren’t designed to guide you. They were designed to show you something you’d rather not look at.

There’s a common assumption in modern spirituality.

That if something appears in mythology:
a god, a spirit, a figure:

it exists to be:

  • followed
  • worked with
  • devoted to

That every presence is a guide.

Something to align with.

Where That Assumption Comes From

It’s a modern lens.

One that prefers:

  • structure
  • reassurance
  • clear roles

Guide. Teacher. Protector.

Something you can place yourself beneath.

Something that gives direction.

What Gets Lost

Older stories weren’t built that way.

They weren’t instruction manuals.

They didn’t exist to make you feel supported or safe.

They existed to:

  • explain
  • warn
  • reflect

And sometimes, to unsettle.

“Not everything that appears in a story is there to help you.”

The Function of These Figures

Some figures aren’t meant to be followed.

They:

  • disrupt
  • expose
  • complicate

They don’t offer clarity.

They force you to confront the absence of it.

This is where people get uncomfortable.

Because it doesn’t give you a role to step into.

There’s nothing to:

  • adopt
  • mirror
  • emulate

Only something to recognise.

Where Interpretation Starts to Drift

When everything is treated as a guide, something gets flattened.

Differences disappear.

A figure that was originally:

  • disruptive
  • ambiguous
  • difficult

becomes something softer.

More usable.

More aligned with what people want.

Why That Happens

Because it’s easier.

If every figure can be:

  • worked with
  • called on
  • aligned to

Then nothing has to remain unresolved.

Nothing has to sit outside your control.

The Alternative

To recognise that some figures:

  • aren’t there for you
  • aren’t offering anything
  • aren’t asking to be followed

They simply exist within the story.

And what they represent exists whether you engage with it or not.

“Not everything symbolic is an invitation.”

What This Changes

It removes the need to:

  • interact with everything
  • assign personal meaning to everything
  • turn every figure into something usable

It allows some things to remain:

  • observational
  • interpretive
  • unresolved

Where This Actually Matters

If you approach everything as something to follow, you lose the ability to:

  • observe without inserting yourself
  • interpret without personalising
  • understand without needing to act

And those are often the more useful positions.

The Part Most People Skip

You don’t need to build a relationship with everything you encounter.

Sometimes the point is simply:

To see it properly.

If you’re trying to force meaning or direction where there isn’t any, that usually says more about the need for structure than the thing itself.

Not everything is a guide.

Some things are just there to be understood.

— Gee 🖤

Scroll to Top